{"id":12390,"date":"2014-04-25T02:38:11","date_gmt":"2014-04-25T02:38:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/192.168.1.14\/index.php\/2014\/04\/25\/usa-2014-04-25\/"},"modified":"2025-09-01T01:20:27","modified_gmt":"2025-08-31T17:20:27","slug":"usa-2014-04-25","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/andrewliu.com.hk\/zh\/usa-2014-04-25\/","title":{"rendered":"USA"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-8065\" src=\"https:\/\/andrewliu.com.hk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2003\/08\/usa_b.jpg\" alt=\"usa_b\" width=\"100\" height=\"66\" \/><\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\">Impact of New US Food Safety Rules on Carriers of Food<\/h4>\n<p><strong><span style=\"line-height: 18px; text-align: justify;\">In January 2011, the UK Club informed Members that a new food safety law called the&nbsp;Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) was passed in the US.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-align: right;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The law requires, in part, that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) implement the&nbsp;Sanitary Food Transportation Act and promulgate regulations requiring shippers, carriers,&nbsp;receivers, and other persons engaged in the transportation of food to use sanitary&nbsp;transportation practices to ensure that food is not transported under conditions that may render&nbsp;food adulterated.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Now, three years later, the law is in its final stages of implementation and the FDA has imposed&nbsp;a deadline of May 31, 2014 for comments on the proposed rule. Once the deadline for&nbsp;comments is concluded, it will be too late to voice any objections or comments and the carriers&nbsp;will be forced to deal with the implications, costs and consequences of the rule.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In brief, the proposed sanitary transportation rule outlines broad expectations without being&nbsp;specific about the means of accomplishing those requirements. Although carriers are the&nbsp;primary target of the rule, shippers are accountable for establishing and informing the carrier of&nbsp;required sanitary and temperature requirements for the transport of food. Needless to say,&nbsp;questions and ambiguity will loom ahead as carriers explore in greater depth the potential&nbsp;financial and operational impacts of this rule.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">As advised, there are only two months left to voice industry concerns before the fast&nbsp;approaching deadline. Comments can be sent to the FDA either in writing or electronically and&nbsp;should reference Docket ID: FDA-2013-N-0013 and\/or RIN: 0910-AG98.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In summary, carriers have a golden opportunity to comment on the rule and help shape the very&nbsp;regulations that will govern their food transportation operations and impact their success and&nbsp;bottom line. For details about the proposed rule, refer to the US Federal Register \/ Vol. 79, No.&nbsp;24 or web address: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.gpo.gov\/fdsys\/pkg\/FR-2014-02-05\/pdf\/2014-02188.pdf\">http:\/\/www.gpo.gov\/fdsys\/pkg\/FR-2014-02-05\/pdf\/2014-02188.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Although the implications of the proposed rule on carriers are still assessing, the initial reaction&nbsp;is that the impact on carriers could be significant and should be carefully scrutinized. A further&nbsp;article will pose questions and discuss some potential ramifications and issues for carriers to&nbsp;consider.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>The second part of a series of Bulletins which cover new rulings by the FDA in the&nbsp;<\/strong><strong>United States concerning changes to the transport of food.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The proposed US food safety transportation rule which is required by the FDA Food Safety&nbsp;Modernization Act (\u201cFSMA\u201d) is intended to help maintain the safety of both human and animal&nbsp;food during transportation by establishing criteria, such as conditions and practices, training and&nbsp;record keeping, for the sanitary transportation of food. The proposed rule contains many&nbsp;processes and requirements that are currently not being adhered by shippers, receivers,&nbsp;international transportation companies, truckers, railroads and logistics companies.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The proposed rule would apply to shipments of food moved under through bills of lading from&nbsp;overseas locations to inland points in the USA and food shipments moved by rail and truck from&nbsp;Mexico and Canada to the USA. The proposed rule would exempt food that is trans-shipped&nbsp;through the United States to another country and food that is imported for future export and is&nbsp;neither consumed nor distributed in the United States.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The initial assessment is that the new proposed rule will place additional costs on carriers, delay&nbsp;shipments and\/or cause shipments to be refused entry into the US.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Based on feedback from shippers, carriers and receivers, the proposed rule, as currently written,&nbsp;would regulate food cargoes with no history or evidence of food safety problems and would&nbsp;markedly increase the cost of carrying food cargoes due in part to increased cargo claims,&nbsp;rendering safe food as adulterated during transportation, unnecessary pre-cooling of reefer&nbsp;equipment, training costs and extensive record keeping. For example, if a shipper and\/or&nbsp;carrier fail to comply with the requirements of this proposed rule and FDA determines that food&nbsp;shipped to the United States by that shipper \u201cmay\u201d as a result be adulterated, such shipments of&nbsp;food would be subject to refusal of admission when offered for entry into the United States.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Based on a review of the 120 page proposed rule, a partial list of proposed requirements and&nbsp;some corresponding comments for carriers and others to consider has been compiled.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong>TEMPERATURE MANAGEMENT<\/strong><\/span><br \/><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Proposed Rule<\/span>: The carrier, upon request by the shipper and\/or the receiver, must demonstrate&nbsp;that he had maintained temperature conditions during the transportation operation consistent&nbsp;with the shipper&#8217;s specifications.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Comments:<\/em><br \/><em>Will the carrier be required to provide microprocessor downloads and event logs that are in&nbsp;violation of the carrier\u2019s claims policy.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Will safe shipments of food be rendered adulterated if the recorded temperatures deviate from&nbsp;the optimal temperature but never come close to a temperature that would render the food as&nbsp;unsafe for human or animal consumption?<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Will an avalanche of cargo claims be filed for failure to demonstrate that the carrier maintained&nbsp;optimal temperature conditions within the shipper&#8217;s specifications? For the vast majority of food&nbsp;shipments, the shipper specified thermostat setting is for maintenance of the quality and&nbsp;condition of food and not for the safety and wholesomeness of the food. Upper temperature&nbsp;limits for the carriage of the food are generally not specified.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong>PRECOOLING REEFER EQUIPMENT<\/strong><\/span><br \/><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Proposed Rule:<\/span> The rule would require the carrier to pre-cool each mechanically refrigerated&nbsp;freezer and cold storage compartment as specified by the shipper before offering a vehicle or&nbsp;transportation equipment with an auxiliary refrigeration unit.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Comment: The proposed rule requiring that all reefer equipment be pre-cooled would be in&nbsp;<\/em><em>direct conflict with the equipment pre-cooling policies of some international carriers. When&nbsp;<\/em><em>perishable cargo is loaded in a hot humid ambient environment, moist air can enter the interior&nbsp;<\/em><em>of the pre-cooled container when the doors are opened. Moisture, in turn, can condense on the&nbsp;<\/em><em>interior surfaces of the pre-cooled container and \u2018rain\u201d on the exposed cargo. In an apparent&nbsp;<\/em><em>contradiction, the proposed rule also states that if the interior of reefer equipment <strong>exhibits any&nbsp;<\/strong><\/em><em><strong>signs excess water<\/strong> under which food may become contaminated, the reefer equipment would&nbsp;<\/em><em>not generally be considered to be in an appropriate sanitary condition for the transport of food.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong>EQUIPMENT DESIGN &amp; CLEANING<\/strong><\/span><br \/><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Proposed Rule:<\/span> The design of transportation equipment used in transportation and the&nbsp;materials used in their manufacture must be suitable and adequately cleanable for their&nbsp;intended use. The food contact surface coatings on vehicles or transportation equipment that&nbsp;are not corrosion resistant or are flaking or chipping could contaminate food due to chemical&nbsp;contamination or by causing the food to become unfit, and would render the vehicles or&nbsp;equipment as not suitable for their intended use.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Comments:<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>If the caustic wash solutions used in processing facilities are used to wash reefer trailers and&nbsp;containers, will the materials used in manufacture of the reefer equipment be suitable? In the&nbsp;last few years, there have been substantial food losses and claims due to the corrosion of&nbsp;aluminium alloys used in the manufacture of some reefer containers.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>\u201cHow clean is clean\u201d with respect to the trailer, railcar or container and the refrigeration unit?&nbsp;Will the equipment need to be microbiologically clean?<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Will limitations be specified for the use and design of specific transport vehicles for the carriage&nbsp;of food?<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Will limitations be specified with regard cross contamination and equipment used for previous&nbsp;shipments? Will <strong>backhauls be limited to specific cargoes?<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong>RECORD KEEPING AND TRAINING<\/strong><\/span><br \/><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Proposed Rule:<\/span> Carriers must develop and implement written procedures subject to record&nbsp;keeping that specify its practices for cleaning, sanitizing, and inspecting vehicles and&nbsp;transportation equipment and the training of carrier personnel. The records applicable to&nbsp;shippers and carriers engaged in transportation operation, such as any written cleaning,&nbsp;sanitizing and inspection procedures, for transportation equipment and training records are&nbsp;retained and available for a period of 12 months.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Comment: What will be the cost of training and record keeping?<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">If Members wish to contact the FDA and voice their concerns they should register their <strong>written&nbsp;comments<\/strong> by no later than May 31, 2014.<\/p>\n<p>Source : UK P&amp;I Club<\/p><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: right;\">25 April 2014<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Impact of New US Food Safety Rules on Carriers of Food In January 2011, the UK Club informed Members that a new food safety law called the&nbsp;Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) was passed in the US. The law requires, in part, that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) implement the&nbsp;Sanitary Food Transportation Act and [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":8065,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[37],"tags":[125],"class_list":["post-12390","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-local-information","tag-english"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/andrewliu.com.hk\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12390","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/andrewliu.com.hk\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/andrewliu.com.hk\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/andrewliu.com.hk\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/andrewliu.com.hk\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12390"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/andrewliu.com.hk\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12390\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19407,"href":"http:\/\/andrewliu.com.hk\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12390\/revisions\/19407"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/andrewliu.com.hk\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8065"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/andrewliu.com.hk\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12390"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/andrewliu.com.hk\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12390"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/andrewliu.com.hk\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12390"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}