{"id":13672,"date":"2017-07-10T09:12:31","date_gmt":"2017-07-10T09:12:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/192.168.1.14\/index.php\/2017\/07\/10\/limitation-fund-owners-be-careful\/"},"modified":"2025-09-01T01:20:01","modified_gmt":"2025-08-31T17:20:01","slug":"limitation-fund-owners-be-careful","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/andrewliu.com.hk\/zh\/limitation-fund-owners-be-careful\/","title":{"rendered":"LIMITATION FUND &#8211; Owners\u2019 be careful"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"text-align: justify;\">&nbsp;<\/span><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-9071\" style=\"padding: 0px; outline: 0px; text-align: justify;\" src=\"https:\/\/andrewliu.com.hk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/06\/pdf.png\" alt=\"pdf\" width=\"16\" height=\"16\" \/><span style=\"text-align: justify;\">&nbsp;<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/andrewliu.com.hk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/ALCO20170009-LIMITATION-FUND-Owners-be-careful.pdf\"><span style=\"text-align: justify;\">ENG<\/span><\/a>&nbsp; &nbsp;<img decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-9071\" style=\"padding: 0px; outline: 0px; text-align: justify;\" src=\"https:\/\/andrewliu.com.hk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/06\/pdf.png\" alt=\"pdf\" width=\"16\" height=\"16\" \/><span style=\"text-align: justify;\">&nbsp;<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/andrewliu.com.hk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/ALCO20170009-LIMITATION-FUND-Owners-be-careful_CN.pdf\"><span style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u4e2d\u6587<\/span><\/a><span style=\"text-align: justify;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-size: 12px; text-align: justify;\">In a new Hong Kong case , a very reputed maritime jurisdiction like England, Floata Consolidation Ltd v Man Hee Ling (Hong Kong) Vehicles Ltd and Others &#8211; [2016] HKCFI 622, High Ct of Hong Kong SAR (Court of First Instance) (Peter Ng J) &#8211; 12 April 2016, it was made clear that the fault of the derrick operator, and person in charge, on the barge (Mr S) fault cannot be attributed as \u2018personal act or omission\u2019 of the ship owners\u2019 for the purpose of article 4 of the 1976 Limitation Convention. Therefore, the decree of limitation granted by the Hong Kong Court would not be set aside.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-size: 12px;\">See attached file: ALCO20170009 LIMITATION FUND &#8211; Owners\u2019 be careful.pdf<\/p>\n<p style=\"border: 0px; outline: 0px; font-size: 12px; text-align: justify;\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"border: 0px; outline: 0px; font-size: 12px; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #022469;\"><strong>\u8d23\u4efb\u9650\u5236\u57fa\u91d1 &#8211; \u8bf7\u8239\u4e1c\u7559\u610f<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u6709\u5982\u82f1\u56fd\u4e00\u6837\uff0c\u9999\u6e2f\u662f\u975e\u5e38\u77e5\u540d\u7684\u6d77\u4e8b\u8f96\u533a\uff0c2016\u5e744\u670812\u65e5\u7684\u65b0\u6848\u4f8bFloata Consolidation Ltd v Man Hee Ling (Hong Kong) Vehicles Ltd and Others &#8211; [2016] HKCFI 622, High Ct of Hong Kong SAR (Court of First Instance) (Peter Ng J) \u9610\u660e\uff0c\u6839\u636e\u300a1976\u5e74\u6d77\u4e8b\u8d23\u4efb\u9650\u5236\u516c\u7ea6\u300b\u7b2c4\u6761\u7684\u89c4\u5b9a\uff0c\u8d77\u91cd\u673a\u64cd\u4f5c\u4eba\u5458\u7684\u8fc7\u5931\u4ee5\u53ca\u8db8\u8239\u8d1f\u8d23\u4eba(S\u5148\u751f)\u7684\u8fc7\u5931\uff0c\u4e0d\u80fd\u5f52\u548e\u4e3a\u8239\u4e1c\u7684\u201c\u4e2a\u4eba\u4f5c\u4e3a\u6216\u4e0d\u4f5c\u4e3a\u201d\u3002\u56e0\u6b64\uff0c\u9999\u6e2f\u6cd5\u9662\u7684\u8d23\u4efb\u9650\u5236\u5224\u4ee4(\u9650\u8d23\u4ee4)\u4e0d\u80fd\u88ab\u64a4\u9500\u3002<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"border: 0px; outline: 0px; font-size: 12px; text-align: justify;\">\u8be6\u7ec6\u4fe1\u606f\u8bf7\u53c2\u9605\u9644\u4ef6\u3002<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-align: justify;\"><br \/><\/span><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;ENG&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;CHN&nbsp;&nbsp; In a new Hong Kong case , a very reputed maritime jurisdiction like England, Floata Consolidation Ltd v Man Hee Ling (Hong Kong) Vehicles Ltd and Others &#8211; [2016] HKCFI 622, High Ct of Hong Kong SAR (Court of First Instance) (Peter Ng J) &#8211; 12 April 2016, it was made clear that [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":9071,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[34],"tags":[125],"class_list":["post-13672","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-circulars","tag-english"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/andrewliu.com.hk\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13672","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/andrewliu.com.hk\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/andrewliu.com.hk\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/andrewliu.com.hk\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/andrewliu.com.hk\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13672"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/andrewliu.com.hk\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13672\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18383,"href":"https:\/\/andrewliu.com.hk\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13672\/revisions\/18383"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/andrewliu.com.hk\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9071"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/andrewliu.com.hk\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13672"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/andrewliu.com.hk\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13672"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/andrewliu.com.hk\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13672"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}